How do you harness Non-Market factors? Anyone in Ontario taking advantage of the province’s “Feed-in Tariff” has an answer.
But while most people can name a host of Market Factors that shape business strategy, including saturation, maturity, fragmentation, etc., the mention of Non-Market Factors (regulation, public pressure, etc.) often draws blank stares.
Market Factor Strategies are built on maximizing offense-oriented business line priorities. Conversely, Non-Market Factor Strategies focus on minimizing negative impacts and liabilities. As a result, responses to Non-Market factors (led by governance, compliance and risk management functions among others) are all too often treated as boxes to be routinely checked off.
The checklist approach can be dangerous, as Non-Market factors can often be a source of Black Swan events. But a strategic plan that fails to integrate your organization’s approach to market and non-market factors also risks missing real opportunities.
Prof. Richard Rumelt of UCLA points out that every change or innovation uncovers (one might add, creates) new value denials. By value denials, Rumelt means missed opportunities. When it comes to Non-Market factors, these opportunities are frequently driven by institutions and constituencies that often treat regulatory and environmental directives as a cost that must be borne and often minimized.
However, some organizations are re-thinking Non-Market Factors as a way to capture opportunities. One way to do this is to rework your risk management plans. This often requires a strategic pivot by the whole organization. A key reason this strategic pivot is not made is that while every organization must manage risk, and many of those risks are on Non-Market fronts, most organizations do not treat risk management as a core line of business.
Three Strategic Planning Approaches that consider both Non-Market and Market Factors
Some of OPTIMUS | SBR’s most daring clients are seeking aggressive ways to retain risk, and harness the opportunities that go along with it. In so doing they are able to create new benefits to stakeholders and customers upstream.
The key to this emerging practice is to balance the capabilities you need to build to meet Non-Market factors such as compliance with ones that also enhance market competiveness. Three key approaches are emerging—
1. Turn Trash into Treasure: Some organizations are developing new, creative ways of finding value hidden in assets abandoned, underused or devalued because of their associated risk. A good example of this is the growing industry of recycling solution providers with ISO and Ministry of the Environment certification that assume others’ ‘risk’, process it and as a result are able to extract valuable material that can be repurposed.
2. Influence the Agenda: partnering with regulatory bodies that are tasked with regulatory oversight has two key benefits: First, you ensure optimal alignment between your organization’s offerings and activities to the regulator’s mandate to achieve social improvements. Second, you position yourself in the marketplace as an adoption leader, effectively minimizing any perceived pass-along risk to your clients. Corporations building corruption-busting partnerships in developing economic zones are an example.
3. Set the Benchmark: By cultivating your mandate and strategy work where stable benchmarks and comparator data do not exist, you could potentially prevent the need for Non-Market factors to be created. The more dynamic utilities and banks are finding ways to partner with their oversight stakeholders to shape the regulatory environment and pre-empt regulation by improving their self-assurance.
Complex and onerous regulatory obligations (think the new Basel III rules, or the EPA’s broadened regulatory efforts under the Clean Air Act) are heating the crucible, forcing —or enticing— both large and mid-size organizations to see factors such as regulatory and environmental risk the way public-sector entities do: as a top-tier success factor. Look for the trend to gather momentum, but in unpredictable ways.
The Trials and Triumphs of Working From Home
We’re sharing six key learnings we’ve uncovered in our first few weeks of transitioning to a virtual workforce.
COVID-19 – Staying Apart, but Still Working Together
We’re 100% virtual and continue to work with our clients to see them through these uncertain times.
Optimus SBR ranks on The Globe and Mail’s Brand-New Ranking of Canada’s Top Growing Companies
Report on Business and The Globe and Mail released the inaugural list of Canada’s Top Growing Companies and ranked Optimus SBR No. 168.
Optimus SBR Ranks on the Growth 500 for the Seventh Consecutive Year
Canadian Business and Maclean’s magazine released the list of Canada’s Fastest-Growing Companies and ranked Optimus SBR No. 273 on the Growth 500. This is the seventh year that Optimus SBR has ranked on the Growth 500.
Decision Time on Ontario Health Teams: The Changing Ontario Health Care Landscape – Part 2
The Ontario Ministry of Health has made some significant decisions on Ontario Health Teams. For many organizations now, it’s decision time.
Optimus SBR Named as 2019 Great Place to Work
We ranked 27 out of 50 in Canada for businesses between 100-999 employees.
The 6 Surprising Reasons Your Project is at Risk
Minimize risk and promote the advancement of your organization by making change management in your project environment a priority.